Rubbish!
BEEEEE
quickly to video review stalker
Shit Ascaron nothing laudable can not do Sacred seemed interesting addition was a little on the s top of the original but only slightly. But Part 2 is already a failure, I was more than 2 weeks could not play. and this addition just shit people are not spending it does not force, not money or time !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
___________________________________________________________
During aspiration !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
He would poigarat!
1 Sacred to me more like
Remind me the game, add that here so here they took would have overturned the gameplay on its head? why am I? besides that - what is the point to criticize the addition of the fact that it does not make the game dofiga innovation? we are now talking about the supplement, and not part of Sacred 3,4,5 ... I do not dispute that the Sacred is not the most successful game of all similar, but know the measure of the criticism ... ps do not understand why Kim figom labor Hayter taken to comment on the games that are poorly digested? 0_o may in the future is to entrust the matter to someone else and do not waste your time on these mediocre attempts and, accordingly, our time on the reading? = z.y.y. But Part 2 is already a failure, I was more than 2 weeks could not play ...
hahaha ... imagine how you whole 2 weeks spat, built acidic mine, sobbed and shouted words of condemnation of developed, but continued to play ... komedioz ... as the saying goes - "author, Pesci ischo! zhzhosh!" HD
To: Armand
+1)) Herbs friend))
To: Armand and nobody says you need to turn the game process on its head, but since already got down to business, so do it well. Add-on that and need that would make some variety in the game process. Example zoroshego add-Kings Bounty PrVDo. and then what sdeleli review I would say no more than a crooked IODE.
I bought a long game, shit and not a game!
Damn, I wanted to buy the International Mobile Equipment! But it's full GoW-but! A talking-razroby Tipo addition better than the original will. GoW-but it is in Africa GoW-but!
QUOTE (caption to the screenshot): "Near the devil must be a new character. Neto. This is a bug."
This is not a bug. It spoiled by pirates)) I for some reason everything is there. If you enter a license key new character will be - protection of the game like that.
I have something in the original could not normally play 
You hit your character up to 14 levels - and all ... arrived. After each load cultural throws back to the main menu. How many do not try - in the rail, no one can hear)) Game probably think harosh with me to play, and gallyutsioniruet happy end to 14 level))) And such a broad review of this shit instead of complement suggests that the author of this article is not very much like Sacred 2 together with the addition of, well - I will not argue, but for some reason I also think that the Ice & Blood received any. I'm tired of these endless rock patches, do not know how to make quality toys. Better already spent an extra half-year - but doing enough games for the normal playability, all the same pleasure of the players want, rather than hemorrhoids. Better already spent an extra half-year
Duc developers went bankrupt. They had six months, they are at the last breath of its finish.
Yes, and in the original was a lot of bugs and here they dofiga and have such a huge fuckin world
That's right - even bugs popoy chew =)
As for bankruptcy - that's what it is and says that the guys like in the first place vyplysti at least for something, lizhby somehow denezhek work out. But the quality of the game spat with high mountains. Turned in a nice wrapper graphics, rivet big world, and launched there virtual creatures for survival, including bugs and errors)
But still I advise the author to more objectively to review the games. Not that he is bad - just too personal dissatisfaction, it really bothers me))
I think it wiser first write all the pluses and minuses, and in the end a small verdict - too good to be =)
big world = a large amount of bugs ...
My opinion is necessary to make the world a small but very tight all the possible chains of quests and opening opportunities to kill the main ridisku ...
garbage
Not ... All the same, they do not outdo Diablo. You can play but is not specifically touches.
An exceptionally biased review, not expecting to see this on the site.
To the review will not quibble. Just to say that people are different and tastes too. I do not consider myself a fan of this series of games, but in my opinion, the game is not as bad as people talk about it. He played (in the licensed version of the game) for Seraphim, High Elf (Drkonmaga confess, I do not yuzal more) serznyh bugs noticed. But sometimes ugly is visible (for example, bluntly made the so-called secret passage to the location of a boss, hero stamps over the abyss, actually hovering in the air).
enough to criticize Ascaron, after its bankruptcy after the first part, All the same, they released the second part of which (I think) got ahrenennoy and addon purely on an amateur, not like - do not bet it, sit in a dark corner and kakoynit poskulivaya wait for Diablo 3 ..
by the way totally agree with Armand `st
To tell the truth good game, I also thought the chippie but it turned
there are pirated versions and have the original I can say I got to odinraz piatskuyu and so ogrchilsya a sacred but after work I went and wanted to take the game to rent and came into my sacred ice & blood
Although we have new games appear Toko pirates and the original
not just somewhere in a year and I tried to take the original caught
home and worked as it should íåáûëî bugs with drakomagom Tipo he is not in the picture was and the experience was given ormalno not like before a ridge
So for Montra hochyu say before criticizing themselves poprobuyti create a game then say if I'm wrong, I write in êîìåíòû look --------------------- yayayaya from Tashkent
In Ise & Blood has not played - will go before the end of the original Sacred 2 - then put ... and look.
How to answer me about Sacred 2:
Pluses:
- In general, an interesting storyline game. 5 for the script "light". in the "darkness" is not played. I do not know.
- Additional tasks in the general dull and blunt, but sometimes come across and interesting - 2
- Really great, but the middle-monotony of the world - 4 (dub for Diablo. If equated to historical masterpieces - 2)
- Zhorosho the refined texture - looks nice - 5
Cons:
- Sea of bugs ... even in the game engine!
- The game eats too many resources - need a powerful computer (and not overdid with graphics and eat bugs in the engine)
- Not very user-friendly management interface (to better)
- Sometimes incomplete map, which creates problems (especially if not seen)
Verdict - directors and zhudozhnikam - medals, commands the programmers and project managers - a kick in the ass!
The game leaves purely on story and art department.
-------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------
My opinion about Diablo 3.
Given where do today is moving the entire game industry, as it moves to the Zh excuse NOT to be much hope for a great game. Be ready for surprises, so that you do not strongly razocharovyvatsya.
MDA, the game went rotten ...
In the same Euro then the work to play something, la? when Iwo entot Diyablo 3 leaves ...
I do not know what a nerd writing this review, but personally I launched normally held the first part. Of the additions I did not like only the absence of the main quest. Game braking, but at least game-play was the most my favorite since the 1 st Sacred.
Armand - +1
And he is a nerd who began to write, let them print out your article and it podotret his ass.
ascaron good company because sacred than she was still darkstar one-good game
To comment, please use the form (for "empty" comments like "yeah", "cool", "super", "Pesci ischo", "author asshole", etc. will be applicable penalties observations up to ban the account).
